On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:25, Andrew Harford <andrew.harford@redbrick.dcu.ie> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:20:27AM +0100, Cian Brennan wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:16:48AM +0100, Andrew Harford wrote:
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 03:26:50AM +0000, Andrew Martin wrote:
Yeah, sounds great, we should do it .....
Are we moving carbon to 10.10? If so, how quickly?
I was certainly under the impression that carbon was going to always be on the most recent ubuntu release, and that users could just put up with it (or use one of the 8.04 machines) if it was less stable.
Aye, that was the plan.
There's still a question of how quickly we move between releases. I'd be in favour of waiting at least one/two weeks after release until the usual collection of post-release fixes come out. Dunno if other people would like to see us wait longer.
Regardless, these things still should happen on a case by case basis, there's no point in installing a new release just because it's out if we know there are still bugs that would affect us.
^^ This sounds like a very sensible way of handling it. No need to jump the gun but move to the newest release as soon as we have a general idea that it wont cause more harm than good. It seems to be generally better than 9.10 or so the lack of people bitching about it would indicate. I've only used the server version on a redbrick VM, upgraded from 10.04, no issue during or since installation.
-- Andrew Harford
You talk about vengeance. Is vengeance going to bring your son back to you? Or my boy to me? --Don Vito Corleone
_______________________________________________ Admin-discuss mailing list Admin-discuss@lists.redbrick.dcu.ie http://lists.redbrick.dcu.ie/mailman/listinfo/admin-discuss
-Alan