2) Yes, I am vice-chair and I have to say that for the last year that I have done not much, not because I didnt want to but because of a monopoly. Pardon?
There has been a monopoly over the last year in the committee, you, phil and kevin! Next year, I know that I will be using my vote to make sure that that does not happen again! Darragh may have done something wrong (im not getting into that argument again) but at least he knew how to listen to people before making decisions about the running of a society. You DONT!
You haven't given a clear argument *against* that, only stating ?I disagree?.
em ... I did if you remember in the email that i sent to you! and i think that ive covered it as well in the last post i made
I beg your pardon? I didn't say it was a bad idea.
DAve that was EXACTLY what you said! you said that "it is a bad idea because it attaches too much importance to the meeting" ... that was your wording!
The implication I was always drawing was that it would be a good idea... but if you can't see that your attending would display that we find this meeting very important *indeed*, I don't know what to do.
I could be tempted to call you every name under the sun in four languages, but im not going to! What i was saying all along was that i thought that it was a good idea me going! and you always said that it wasnt!
BTW Dave, I asked you for your number before on a few occasions and offered you mine but you told me there was no point. This was a *long* time ago, wasn't it? I remember it being a good few months back. We were talking. On Minds. And college was still on.
and in the halls and before exams! at least three seperate occasions and i did need your number sometimes, esp when i was talking to noel and couldnt find hide or hair of you around! Bon _______________________________________ "So long, and thanks for all the fish" 20 email addresses from 15,000 domain names - free at http://www.another.com