[ David Barrett ]
This was thought up not to show that we dealt with the incident well, but our worth to college and how we were not a security hole.
I see what you mean, but I think our worth to the college can be adequately expressed via the Past, Present & Future doc. I think the CC are going to be more interested in the incident and its implications than that stuff, to be honest. So our submission should reflect that ...
the Centre will be interested in. This would make it obvious that we've done our own investigation and that we know exactly what happened. It's all about reducing work they have to do ... Fair point... however, if we want to show that we did a proper investigation, wouldn't we need to at least give a *rough* idea of how many emails were sent?
We can give an estimate, if we can get the logs. That's not the most important part of it though; the method, and exactly what happened from the outset, is far more interesting information. Cian -- "there is nothing wrong /* Cian with emulating a man ** I need to sleep. Let me sleep. who has a nice beard" */ while(student);