Sounds good to me - see my other mail about our meeting in town? (associate & member friendly, in a central post-work place!) Btw, we totally wouldn't let associates take this bad boy over. This is for everyone (and for everyone in the future). I like the meeting idea so that you cool committee people can see us "associates" aren't all wrinkles and anger. :-) Karl On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 03:37:29PM +0100, dregin@redbrick.dcu.ie wrote:
I think a limit of 3 people is too constricting. Also, would having the team made up solely of associates not leave quite a bit of Redbrick's history out of the book?
I think at least one open meeting should be had so that people will get to voice their opinions on the plans for the book. A small group of people are going to find it hard to cater to everyone's tastes, so I think an open meeting will at least give the team a better idea of what is wanted.
Bernard
Hey,
Basically, for this we need a max of 3 people. Anymore and it'll be a pain in the ass. A big old meeting wouldn't be a good idea, except to decide on those 2 or 3 people.
Personally I nominate Karl to do it. :)
I'll happily volunteer my services for the design of the book if needed, I'll leave the editing/collating stuff to someone else though.
- Kevin
_______________________________________________ Redbrick-birthday mailing list Redbrick-birthday@lists.redbrick.dcu.ie http://lists.redbrick.dcu.ie/mailman/listinfo/redbrick-birthday
-- Hello. I'm Leonard Nimoy. The following tale of alien encounters is true. And by true, I mean false. It's all lies. But they're entertaining lies. And in the end, isn't that the real truth? The answer is: No. -- What was the question again?, "The Springfield Files"